Medical Care
Melasma can be difficult to treat. The pigment of melasma develops gradually, and resolution is also gradual. Resistant cases or recurrences of melasma occur often and are certain if strict avoidance of sunlight is not rigidly heeded. [14] All wavelengths of sunlight, including the visible spectrum, are capable of inducing melasma. The best treatment remains a topical combination hydroquinine cream, sun avoidance, and no estrogen exposure. Boosters are only of limited benefit. A chemical peel or laser treatment may help in about a third of cases, a third of cases remain the same, and another third show hyperpigmentation. [15]
Prophylactic management is often the most effective means of prevention. Avoidance of sun exposure and use of high-SPF sunscreens (50+) can prevent the development of melasma. In one study of 200 Moroccan women who applied SPF-50+ sunscreen daily during pregnancy, less than 3% developed melasma. Although the study did not include its own control arm, this is well below the established rates of development in pregnancy (15-50%). [16]
The role of oral contraceptives in the development of melasma has been clearly defined, especially in women without a family history of the condition.
Therefore, discontinuation of these medications and avoidance of oral contraceptive pills in the future is recommended when possible in women who have onset of melasma after starting these drugs.
The mainstay of treatment for melasma remains topical depigmenting agents. Hydroxyquinone (HQ) is a classic and still commonly used first-line agent, both alone and when combined with other agents, although there are concerns regarding adverse effects with long-term use [17] It is a hydroxyphenolic chemical that inhibits tyrosinase, the enzyme that converts L-tyrosine to L-DOPA and the rate-limiting step in the pathway of melanin synthesis. Additionally, cytotoxic metabolites may cause interference with melanocyte function and viability. HQ can be applied in cream form or as an alcohol-based solution.
Concentrations vary from a 2% concentration available in the United States without a prescription to a standard 4% concentration and even higher when compounded. Efficacy is directly linked to concentration, but the incidence of adverse effects also increases with concentration. All concentrations can lead to skin irritation, phototoxic reactions with secondary postinflammatory hyperpigmentation, and irreversible exogenous ochronosis (reported even with long-term use of 2% HQ). Special care must be taken not to prescribe the monobenzyl ether of HQ (Benoquin), which causes an irreversible localized and generalized vitiligolike leukoderma. Outside the United States, topical creams with concentrations as high as 8% are available over the counter. These agents are associated with much higher rates of exogenous ochronosis and should not be used.
In recent years, concerns have been raised about the potential carcinogenic properties of HQ. This is based on the observation that hepatic metabolism of this agent results in the production of benzene derivatives during hepatic metabolism. In the case of topical application of HQ, this does not appear to be a concern, as the vast majority of metabolism of topically applied HQ is metabolized in the vascular system and renally excreted. [18] This knowledge has led to concern that free-radical metabolites could induce acute or chronic kidney injury; however, no association has been demonstrated in the 50+ year history of HQ’s use as a topical solution. [19] To date, all concerns regarding HQ’s potential toxic effect are considered speculative.
The use of topical retinoids (trans-retinoic-acid) can be effective as monotherapy. These agents are derivatives of vitamin A and lead to increased keratinocyte turnover and decreased melanocyte activity. They also increase the permeability of the epidermis, allowing for better penetration of adjunct therapies. [20, 21]
Care must be taken with these agents, however, as retinoids are known teratogens. It is essential to avoid prescribing systemic retinoid therapy to pregnant patients or patients attempting to become pregnant. Additionally, although there is no evidence that topical retinoids are associated with congenital malformations, pregnant patients should be counseled concerning the risks and benefits of treatment for a cosmetic condition. The response to treatment with topical retinoids is also less than that with HQ and can be slow, with improvement frequently taking 6 months or longer.
Owing to tretinoin’s ability to increase the effectiveness of other therapies, combinations of tretinoin with HQ, with or without a topical corticosteroid, have been promoted. [20] In fact, the only topical ointment currently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of melasma is a triple-combination cream, a composite of hydroquinone 4%, tretinoin 0.05%, and fluocinolone acetonide 0.01% (Tri-Luma). Comparative studies of the effectiveness of the triple-combination cream versus topical HQ suggest that the combination cream is faster and more effective at reducing melasma pigmentation, but it does carry a slightly increased risk of an adverse reaction. [22] A 2010 study found that the triple-combination cream is safe and effective when used intermittently or continuously for up to 24 weeks. [23]
The major adverse effect of tretinoin is mild skin irritation, especially when the more effective, higher concentrations are used. Temporary photosensitivity and paradoxical hyperpigmentation can also occur. Tretinoin is believed to work by increasing keratinocyte turnover, thus limiting the transfer of melanosomes to keratinocytes. Adapalene is a synthetic retinoid analog that may be an alternative to tretinoin. A study in Asian Indian patients compared adapalene 0.1% topical to 0.05% tretinoin. After 14 weeks, reduction in MASI scores were equivalent between the two therapies, while the adapalene group developed fewer adverse effects and reported better tolerance to the therapy. [24]
Azelaic acid, available as a 20% cream-based formulation, appears to be an effective alternative to 4% HQ and may be superior to 2% HQ in the treatment of melasma. [25, 26] The mechanism of action is similar to that of HQ, but, unlike HQ, azelaic acid seems to target only hyperactive melanocytes and thus will not lighten skin with normally functioning melanocytes. The primary adverse effect is skin irritation. No phototoxic or photoallergic reactions have been reported.
Other depigmenting agents that have been studied in the treatment of melasma are 4-N -butylresorcinol, phenolic-thioether, 4-isopropylcatechol, kojic acid, and ascorbic acid. [27] It has been suggested that taking an oral proanthocyanidin (a class of flavonols) along with a vitamin regimen may significantly reduce pigmentation. At this time, the mechanism for this treatment method is not fully understood. Significantly more study is necessary before this method of treatment could be deemed effective. One major benefit to this mode, however, is that the use of proanthocyanidin is a natural treatment method, and it is a safe alternative in patients who exhibit a moderate or severe adverse reaction to a topical treatment. [28]
In an attempt to search for a new treatment for melasma, Wu et al studied oral administration of tranexamic acid (TA) in Chinese patients. Tranexamic acid tablets were prescribed to 74 patients at a dosage of 250 mg twice daily for 6 months. At follow-up, more than half of patients (54%) showed good results. This treatment may be effective for some patients, but further study is needed. [29] Other reports have also described sucessful treatment with oral TA. [30, 31]